- From: Wendy Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:47:21 -0400
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Available: <http://www.w3.org/2005/09/22-wai-wcag-minutes.html> [1]W3C [1] http://www.w3.org/ WCAG WG weekly telecon 22 Sep 2005 [2]Agenda [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2005JulSep/0849.html See also: [3]IRC log [3] http://www.w3.org/2005/09/22-wai-wcag-irc Attendees Present Sofia_Celic, Makoto_Ueki, Becky_Gibson, Roberto_Scano, Loretta_Guarino_Reid, Wendy Chisholm, Matt_May, Tim_Boland, Bengt_Farre, Michael_Cooper, Alex_Li, Luca Mascaro, Gregg Vanderheiden, Ben Caldwell, Gian Sampson-Wild, Katie_Haritos-Shea, Andi_Snow_Weaver, Roberto_Ellero, Neil_Soiffer Regrets John_Slatin, Takayuki_Watanabe, Rob_Haverty, Roberto_Castaldo, Christophe Strobbe, David MacDonald Chair Gregg Scribe wendy Contents * [4]Topics 1. [5]Example guide document for 1.1 L1 SC1 2. [6]team a update 3. [7]team b update 4. [8]team c update 5. [9]Heartbeat publication requirements * [10]Summary of Action Items _________________________________________________________________ Example guide document for 1.1 L1 SC1 discussion about "common failures" - ideas for what could go in there, concern about this section exploding with test cases (although could be helpful), concern about use of "and" between sufficient techniques and failure points. resolution: use model of guideline 1.1 l1 sc1 for guides. "common failures" will evolve. <[11]http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2005/09/end-to-end/text-equiv-informative.html > [11] http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2005/09/end-to-end/text-equiv-informative.html%3E discussion of timing and moving forward (ala Michael's summary at - [12]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-teamb/2005Sep/0140.html) [12] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-teamb/2005Sep/0140.html) team a update no new items for discussion this week. trying to assemble all of the key parts for next week. all groups should have this goal - bring essential pieces for each SC for discussion next week. team b update latest defn proposal: [13]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2005JulSep/0854.html [13] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2005JulSep/0854.html proposal is to remove "acronym" from SC since acronyms are abbreviations. abbreviation Shortened form of a word, phrase or name, i.e. a general category that includes abbreviations, initialisms and acronyms. resolution: abbreviation Shortened form of a word, phrase or name, i.e. a general category that includes abbreviations, initialisms and acronyms. resolution: initialism - the shortened form of a name or phrase made from the initial letters of words or syllables contained in that name or phrase. Not defined in all languages. SNCF is a French initialism that contains the initial letters of the Societe National des Chemins de Fer, the French national railroad. ESP is an initialism for extrasensory perception. (removed "unpronounceable" so as not to restrict it too much) resolution: acronym - An abbreviation made from the initial letters of a name or phrase that contains several words. Many acronyms can be pronounced as words. Defined differently in different languages. For example, NOAA is an abbreviation made from the initial letters of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in the United States. resolution: adopt 3.1 L3 SC3 as A mechanism for finding the expanded form of abbreviations is available. (removed word "acronym" since in defn of abbreviation) team c update working on defn of " input error" but not yet ready for survey. <Andi> [14]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-teamc/2005Sep/0043.html [14] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-teamc/2005Sep/0043.html drafts for guides for 3 of 4 SC. will be looking at on Monday. will be focusing in on priorities for guide doc. should we done w/priority items for 2.5 soon. maybe not by next meeting, but close. minutes from last week, closed all issues but 2: [15]http://www.w3.org/2005/09/15-wai-wcag-minutes.html [15] http://www.w3.org/2005/09/15-wai-wcag-minutes.html last open issue of 2.5 list is [16]http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1017 [16] http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1017 proposal to close issue with, "although it is a good goal, every number we suggested was either unnecessarily restrictive or counterproductive. therefore, were unable to figure out how to make this work." proposal to include this as advisory for 2.5 resolution: close issue 1017 with above text (or something along those lines) Heartbeat publication requirements requirement that every 3 months rec-track documents must publish. can request to skip, if publish a status report. will make request, draft report, and send report past group for approval for publication. plan is to have next draft 3 weeks after f2f (week of 7 November) Summary of Action Items [End of minutes] _________________________________________________________________ Minutes formatted by David Booth's [17]scribe.perl version 1.127 ([18]CVS log) $Date: 2005/09/22 21:41:50 $ [17] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm [18] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/ _________________________________________________________________
Received on Thursday, 22 September 2005 21:47:48 UTC