- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 11:00:14 -0500
- To: "'Michael Cooper'" <michaelc@watchfire.com>, "'WAI GL \(E-mail\)'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
I think that captures it Michael. I will add to the templates. Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Michael Cooper Sent: Friday, September 02, 2005 10:53 AM To: WAI GL (E-mail) Subject: applicability conditions I took an action item [1] to propose wording for the description of "when does this technique work or not work" in the structure of documents proposal [2]. As I understood the discussion during the call, this point was intended to address both the concept of "applicability condition" as we've discussed in other calls of the techniques task force [1], as well as the indication of baseline similar to what was in one of Becky's proposals [4]. I think a way to cover these intents succinctly might be: "Indication of the technologies required by the technique, and technology features for which the technique is applicable." Michael [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/09/01-wai-wcag-minutes.html#action02 [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2005JulSep/att-0658/WCAG_Guid elines_and_Support_DocumentsV2.doc [3] http://www.w3.org/2005/01/12-wai-wcag-irc.html#T16-21-20 [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2005JulSep/att-0535/dhtmlMenu s.html --- Signature --- Michael Cooper Accessibility Product Manager, Watchfire 1 Hines Rd Suite 200, Kanata, ON K2K 3C7 Canada Tel: +1 (613) 599-3888 x4019 Fax: +1 (613) 599-4661 Email: michaelc@watchfire.com Web: http://www.watchfire.com/
Received on Friday, 2 September 2005 16:00:24 UTC