- From: Sebastiano Nutarelli (IWA/HWG) <snutarelli@webaccessibile.org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 02:35:09 -0400
- To: "WCAG WG mailing list" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Ok, now we're talking about the same thing :) I'm not agree me too to reject David MacDonald proposal about HTML test n° 187, if label it's correct it could be a benefit have more than one label associated with the same input. Anyway it don't directly violate any specification.. Regards ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: "Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG" <rscano@iwa-italy.org> Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 18:48:25 +0200 > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf >Of Yvette Hoitink >Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 6:42 PM >To: 'WCAG WG mailing list' >Subject: RE: Tests 186, 187, 188, 189, > >We're not talking about having multiple identical IDs, but having multiple >labels that belong to the same ID. So you wouldn't have the same ID twice, >you only refer to it twice. For example: > ><label for="input1">First label describing option 1</label><input >id="input1" type="radio" value="1"><label for="input1">Second label >describing option 1</label>. This does not violate HTML spec and can have >accessibility benefits. > >Roberto Scano: >Ok... I add myself to bugzilla (translation: I need holidays :D) >Touche :) > > > -- Sebastiano Nutarelli IWA/HWG Member W3C WCAG Working Group Member E-mail: snutarelli@webaccessibile.org --
Received on Thursday, 11 August 2005 06:37:59 UTC