- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 21:42:12 -0500
- To: "'Wendy Chisholm'" <wendy@w3.org>, <neil.whiteley@tag2.net>
- Cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Looks very interesting Everyone - please post any comments you have against the following. If we don't identify any (that we can't address) I propose we move to this wording. If we get comments - we can address/incorporate them and move to new wording. At 01:34 PM 7/15/2005, Neil Whiteley wrote: I propose that all 4 Principals (taking into account Johns proposal) could be written thus: 1. Content is perceivable 2. User interface components in the content are operable 3. Content and controls are understandable 4. Content is able to work with current and future technologies (the last one may be a bit specific. Robust was too vague but 'working with future technologies" is a bit impossible. Anyone think of a fix or way to not sound so ....... hard to achieve? (since we can never really make things so that they will work with all future technologies) Thanks Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison
Received on Monday, 18 July 2005 02:42:54 UTC