- From: Jason White <jasonw@ariel.its.unimelb.edu.au>
- Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 16:52:50 +1100
- To: "Gregg Vanderheiden" <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Cc: "'Loretta Guarino Reid'" <lguarino@adobe.com>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Gregg Vanderheiden writes: > I like Loretta's posting too. > > But I think we should consider keeping the plug in ref. people don't always > think of plug ins as user agents and we should not figure they will have > read another doc. Perhaps we should remove it from the success criterion but include it as an example in the informative material that follows the success criteria. Also, is there a better term than "plug-in" which would be more amenable to translation and more easily grasped by people who haven't heard of plug-ins?
Received on Sunday, 27 February 2005 05:54:09 UTC