- From: John M Slatin <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 20:03:54 -0500
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <C46A1118E0262B47BD5C202DA2490D1A03317EA7@MAIL02.austin.utexas.edu>
Greetings from Redwood Shores: Participants in the July 12-13 meeting of the WCAG Working Group reached consensus on the following items about conformance, and agreed to propose the wording below for inclusion in the next Working Draft of WCAG 2.0. <proposed> Conformance 1. Any conformance with WCAG 2.0 requires that all Level 1 success criteria for all guidelines be met. 2. WCAG 2.0 conformance at level A means that all Level 1 success criteria for all guidelines are met. 3. WCAG 2.0 conformance at Level AA means that all Level 1 and all Level 2 success criteria for all guidelines are met 4. WCAG 2.0 conformance at Level AAA means that all Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3 success criteria for all guidelines are met Conformance claims 1. All conformance claims must include at least the following information: a. The version of the guidelines to which the conformance claim is made. b. The URI of the authored unit for which the claim is being made. (Editor's note: the phrase "authored unit" should be linked to a glossary definition based on the definition of this term in the Device Independence Working Group's Glossary of Terms at http://www.w3.org/TR/di-gloss/ <http://www.w3.org/TR/di-gloss/> ) . c. The level of conformance being claimed. 2. The conformance level for an authored unit that contains other authored units is equal to the lowest conformance level claimed for the authored unit and any of the units it contains. Editor's Note #1: A question has been raised as to whether the information required in items 1(a)-1(c) above should all be transmitted in the HTTP header or in some other way. Editor's Note #2: We are currently looking at how to handle unknown or community-contributed, authored units that are created using an aggregator supplied tool. If the aggregator-supplied tool conforms to ATAG, can ATAG conformance be used to imply that the aggregated content conforms to WCAG? </proposed> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - FIGHT BACK AGAINST SPAM! Download Spam Inspector, the Award Winning Anti-Spam Filter http://mail.giantcompany.com <http://mail.giantcompany.com/>
Received on Wednesday, 14 July 2004 21:03:56 UTC