- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 16:17:10 -0500
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
We will be meeting joint with the Authoring Tools Working Group this week so we will be meeting FRIDAY and NOT THURSDAY. DATE: Friday Oct 24 TIME: 4:00 EASTERN time 20:00-21:30 UTC Call in Number: +1.617.761.6200, Conf Code: 2894 ("AUWG") AGENDA 1. How ATAG and WCAG reference each other. Where does WCAG reference ATAG? Where does ATAG reference WCAG? What is needed in the organization of the documents to make the references as straight-forward as possible? What can we do in WCAG to decrease the complexity of ATAG's relationship with WCAG (relative conformance)? More thoughts at [1] 2. Scope of the documents. Basically, ATAG covers the process of generating the content and t thus includes Content Management Systems (CMS), authoring tools, etc. WCAG covers the end result of the authoring process (thus does not cover CMS). However, what about web applications that generate content? ATAG and WCAG could produce a shared techniques document "techniques for application that generate content" that would refer to both ATAG and WCAG checkpoints. 3. The suitability of requirements to use W3C recommendations. ATAG 1.0 only discusses producing content for W3C formats. WCAG 1.0 says only use W3C formats. How should the 2.0 versions of WCAG and ATAG reference W3C technologies? In WCAG 2.0 we had checkpoint 4.3 (this has evolved since this was published) [2], although all of Guideline 4 [3] relates to technology. 4. Development of test suites - How do we coordinate development and reuse? How do we design a test suite that is beneficial for both ATAG and WCAG? What will be the differences between our test suite needs? We also need to coordinate with UAWG and QAWG. 5. If we have time -- Metadata in WCAG and any other topics that are raised. NOTE: AUWG should be aware that the WCAG WG recently adopted a new organization of the document and we will be talking from this perspective [4]. We are moving towards 3 levels of conformance (which should help address issues raised during the AUWG F2F in September in Seattle). This is part of the 1st agendum. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2003OctDec/0007.html [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#technology-supports-access [3] http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2003/10/reorg5.html#robust [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2003OctDec/0034.html Gregg Co-Chair WCAG WG
Received on Wednesday, 22 October 2003 17:17:13 UTC