- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@sidar.org>
- Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 17:59:45 +0200
- To: gv@trace.wisc.edu
- Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Gregg, this proposal looks like a very important step forwards. In Sidar's participation in the EuroAccessibility work on harmonising our accessibility testing across a large number of organisations the relative simplicity of the WCAG 1 scheme has been very helpful. A conformance scheme that makes very clear the migration from WCAG 1 to WCAG 2, and that is cleanly compatible with the Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines is extremely helpful to organisations wanting to prepare for a smooth migration between versions. In particular it makes it possible in flexible environments to test the migration at working draft stage, rather than being forced through resource constraints to hold off preparing the transition until after WCAG2 has been published. This should in turn benefit the development of WCAG 2 itself... cheers Chaals On Thursday, Oct 9, 2003, at 19:41 Europe/Zurich, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote: > Described here is an alternate way to look at conformance > > It addresses the following concerns > > 1 - multiple dimensions of conformance > 2 - match to WCAG 1.0 in structure and measures > ... -- Charles McCathieNevile Fundación Sidar charles@sidar.org http://www.sidar.org
Received on Monday, 13 October 2003 12:00:36 UTC