On Tuesday, March 18, 2003, at 04:41 PM, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote: > Oh AND, someone pointed out that if we use that numbering scheme - > that it > doesn't translate to other languages. I said that. > But if we use > 1-2-1-4 > it says nothing. No clue as to what it means or belongs to...... > hmmmmmm. I think M, S, and T are needless redefinitions. Nobody outside of this list will know or care what they mean. A, AA, and AAA are at least recognizable. If it's a matter of screen-reader capability, then I suggest the terms spelled out: "A", "double A" and "triple A". Or something else that's sequential, like A, B, and C. - mReceived on Tuesday, 18 March 2003 21:04:34 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:32:11 UTC