- From: Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 22:29:55 +0100
- To: <ishida@w3.org>, <w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org>, <public-i18n-geo@w3.org>, "Al Gilman" <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
- Cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
----- Original Message ----- From: "Al Gilman" <asgilman@iamdigex.net> To: <ishida@w3.org>; <w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org>; <public-i18n-geo@w3.org> Cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 3:57 PM Subject: Re[2]: FW: acronym in title... >I think that the one thing I should add right away is that there >is an option using "annotation" techniques to leave the attribute as is >and introduce a higher-quality equivalent through a structure which >refers to the attribute. Hum... interesting idea... but how do you think to apply this? So, as you told in the last e-mail, there is no possibility to have it before XHTML 2.0? Is not possible to make a "correction" to, for example, XHTML 1.x (creating, for eg. XHTML 1.2?) >This issue is coupled with providing clarifying information for natural >language in all kinds of texts. PF will have a page in public on this topic >in a few days. Wonderful :) Roberto Scano IWA/HWG EMEA Coordinator W3C Advisory Committee Representative for IWA/HWG International Webmasters Association / HTML Writers Guild http://www.iwanet.org - http://www.hwg.org E-Mail: emea@iwanet.org - w3c-rep@iwanet.org --------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Thursday, 13 March 2003 16:30:11 UTC