- From: Ben Caldwell <caldwell@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 11:45:54 -0600
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
I'm passing these comments on regarding checkpoint 1.5. They come from Judy Harkins, who is the director of the Technology Assessment Program at Gallaudet University, and are in response to a request for advice about the difference between foreground and background sound such that background sounds would not interfere with foreground sounds. Her comments are based on the Jan 8 draft of WCAG 2.0. -Ben -----Original Message----- From: Judy Harkins [mailto:judy.harkins@tap.gallaudet.edu] Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 6:15 PM To: Ben Caldwell Subject: Re: Foreground and Background Audio Question Ben, I think "audio presentation" is not the best term to be counterpart to "text content." Usually foreground audio content is speech, and that would be the clearest way to say it. So...Minimum level would be: Speech content is not presented over background sounds or music that seriously interfere with the intelligibility of the speech content unless the background sounds can be easily removed. I would suggest that Level 2 for audio be at the current one for level 3 Re dB level I would say at least 20 dB lower. And that level 3 for audio be the same as for visual, i.e., "there are no background sounds or music" Benefits, simpler to say, Background sounds interfere with the ability of someone with a hearing impairment to understand speech, and may also interfere with the intelligibility of the speech to someone who is in an environment with ambient noise. Under examples, example 2, you might want to say "speech track" instead of narration. Hope this helps, Judy
Received on Wednesday, 26 February 2003 12:45:22 UTC