- From: Marco Trevisan | Bazzmann.Com <info@bazzmann.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 10:28:00 +0100
- To: gv@trace.wisc.edu
- CC: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Gregg Vanderheiden wrote: > 1) Good summary Jason. Yes, thank you Jason. :) > 3) I don't think we should coin a new term. It will only lead to confusion. > And "jargon" violates our rules unless it is not possible to avoid. I just thought about non-english peoples who could find this term a little bit confusing (they speak and write english, but they aren't english native). Often they feedback me this. > 'All functionality achievable through character input" > -- Where "Character input" is defined as "Unicode characters and > standard cursor movement and data entry controls, (i.e. tab, shift tab, > enter, 4 arrowkeys, escape, backspace, & delete). I think this kind of description is better than older, more intuitive. -- Bazzmann Labs - Accessibilita', usabilita', webdesign e standard W3C ::-----------------------------::---------------------------------:: http://www.bazzmann.it | Consulenza, servizi e soluzioni. http://www.bazzmann.com | Notizie, approfondimenti, articoli, guide. http://www.dev2dev.it | Elemento D2D002
Received on Tuesday, 11 February 2003 04:28:39 UTC