- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 07:55:08 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
- cc: "'Web Content Guidelines'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Ciao Roberto, I thin this is more in the area of the Evaluation and Repair Tools group than WCAG - beyond the basic specification of conformance. EARL is designed to allow things like checksums - but it isn't true that a page will have a checksum of the HTML, since it may be served by content negotiation or other dynamic generation techniques. I'd encourage you (and anyone interested in this problem) to look at http://www.w3.org/TR/earl cheers Chaals On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG wrote: >One thing is: how a webdesigner can assure that the page visible for eg. in >www.xxxxxxxx.com has not changed since the validation? I've thinked about a >procedure like the "checksum" that is done for the validation of files: a >web generated page is always HTML/XHTML so apply a checksum to this page >could give the real "photo" of the page and let the user to check (with a >checksum validator) is something has been changed. > >What you think about?
Received on Thursday, 26 June 2003 07:55:13 UTC