RE: [#285] Proposal: Rename Core Techniques as Cross-Technology Techniques

I realize that General and Cross-Technology were discussed at
the most recent audio conference as terms to replace the existing
term - Core.  I do not have a better term in mind but thought we were to
have gone away and come up with other possibilities.  

Seeing as how we are into actual selection, I prefer 
Cross-Technology Techniques.

Doyle Burnett

Special Education Service Agency
www.sesa.org
 
-------Original Message-------
 
From: Lee Roberts
Date: Friday, June 20, 2003 06:55:06 AM
To: gv@trace.wisc.edu; 'Charles McCathieNevile'; 'Ben Caldwell'
Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: RE: [#285] Proposal: Rename Core Techniques as Cross-Technology
Techniques
 
Cross-technology seems to be more suitable to what we are trying to say
in the core techniques. My vote is for cross-technology techniques.
 
Lee
 
-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Gregg Vanderheiden
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 7:11 AM
To: 'Charles McCathieNevile'; 'Ben Caldwell'
Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: RE: [#285] Proposal: Rename Core Techniques as Cross-Technology
Techniques
 
 
 
I think that cross-technology is better because they will show up on all
the technology specific checklists -- and this suggests that.
 
Also, it is not clear that general guidelines have to be used with
something else.
 
 
Gregg
 
-- ------------------------------ 
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. 
Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
Director - Trace R & D Center 
University of Wisconsin-Madison 
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Charles McCathieNevile
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 4:28 PM
To: Ben Caldwell
Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: RE: [#285] Proposal: Rename Core Techniques as Cross-Technology
Techniques
Importance: High
 
 
I prefer that someone else decide between these two.
 
cheers
 
Chaals
 
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, Ben Caldwell wrote:
 
>
>Issue #285 [1] was discussed at this afternoon's call. We resolved that
 
>the name should be changed, but have not settled on what that name 
>should be.
>
>Candidates include:
>
>1.) Cross-Technology Techniques
>2.) General Techniques
>
>Please indicate your preference.
>
>-Ben
>
>[1] http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=285

>
>
>
 
-- 
Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles tel: +61 409
134 136
SWAD-E http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe fax(france): +33 4 92 38
78
22
Post: 21 Mitchell street, FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia or
W3C, 2004 Route des Lucioles, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
 
 
 
 
 
.

Received on Friday, 20 June 2003 11:29:40 UTC