- From: David MacDonald <befree@magma.ca>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 17:48:31 -0400
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 5 June 2003 17:48:39 UTC
Hi Montgomery In many ways I agree that Active is better than Passive and my Mom the grammar queen would too. That was my original thinking when I brought up the issue. But John and Gregg have good points. My feeling is that all guidelines should be in the same voice whether that be active or passive and since the guidelines would have to go into major contortion mode to become "active" I think perhaps for this draft we should just bring the 4 passive guidelines into alignment with the others which are passive. ========================= Access Empowers People... ...Barriers Disable Them <http://www.eramp.com/> www.eramp.com
Received on Thursday, 5 June 2003 17:48:39 UTC