RE: Definition: time-dependent presentation

Katie wrote: 

 

> .......I think that the (2) is a definition of "response time
dependent

> presentation", rather than "time-dependent presentation".  The
response

> time issue is very important, but different.

 

 

GV:  Response time is not what is being discussed here.   Response time
IS a different issue.

 

But this is talking about the case where a person must respond at a
certain place in a presentation.    When this occurs, a transcript is
not sufficient.     A transcript that says " and for xxxx hit your enter
key now"  doesn't work if the enter key has to be hit at a certain place
in the audio program.    

 

  (an alternate HTML doc with a link located at that point might be  IF
it gets you the same result.)

 

So the issue IS essentially the same I think.   Basically, it means that
any audio transcript has to be synchronized with the normal audio track
in order to be effective.  

 

 

Or were you trying to get at something different?

 

 

Gregg

 

------------------------------------

Gregg Vanderheiden Ph.D.

Ind Engr - Biomed - Trace,  Univ of Wis

gv@trace.wisc.edu

 

 

 

 

> -----Original Message-----

> From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On
Behalf

> Of Katie Haritos-Shea

> Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 11:57 AM

> To: _W3C WAI WCAG (GL); 3WC WAI X-TECH

> Subject: Definition: time-dependent presentation

> 

> 

> I am cross posting because this is a WCAG 2.0 definition that needs
some

> work.......

> Currently in the latest WCAG 2.0 Draft "time-dependent presentation"
is

> defined as below......

> 

> <qoute>

> 

> Definitions (informative)

> time-dependent presentation

> 

> (1)A time-dependent presentation is a presentation which

> is composed of synchronized audio and visual tracks (e.g., a movie),

> 

> OR

> 

> (2)a presentation which requires the user to respond interactively at

> specific times in the presentation.

> 

> </quote>

> 

> .......I think that the (2) is a definition of "response time
dependent

> presentation", rather than "time-dependent presentation".  The
response

> time issue is very important, but different.

> 

> Also, I think it would be a good idea to provide language that
includes

> other sense modalities (tracks).  I realize that it is a bit premature

> to include "synchronized smell" and "synchronized vibration" tracks,

> but, I think we should have language that covers this eventuality.

> 

> 

> Katie Haritos-Shea

> 

> Internet/Software/Device Accessibility and Standards

> Strategist/Developer/Evangelist

> 

> #571-220-7777

> 

> "The best and most beautiful things in the world

>      cannot be seen or even touched.

>     They must be felt with the heart."

>                 - Helen Keller

 

Received on Sunday, 23 June 2002 22:48:33 UTC