- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 15:46:44 -0400 (EDT)
- To: "Chris O'Kennon" <chris@vipnet.org>
- cc: "'Tom Gilder'" <w3c@tom.me.uk>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, Harvey Bingham <hbingham@acm.org>
More to the point, by using styling effects to convey information needed to understand the page you are breaking the checkpoints that require seperation of style and the page's information... If your background image conveys information it shouldn't be a background image - it should be a part of the information of the page. cheers Chaals On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Chris O'Kennon wrote: The same would apply, I assume, for images that are the backgrounds of table cells. Chris O'Kennon Commonwealth of Virginia -----Original Message----- From: Tom Gilder [mailto:w3c@tom.me.uk] Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 2:58 PM To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org; Harvey Bingham Subject: Re: Background image On Friday, June 7, 2002, 5:48:07 PM, Harvey Bingham wrote: > Question: Does a background image need alt text? If so, how should > it be recognizable? No, it does not - unless the text is *essential* to understanding the page (few background images are however - they are mostly presentational). If the image is essential (does the page make no sense if you removed it?), then you could include separate text on the page, providing the same function of the image. -- Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles phone: +61 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI fax: +33 4 92 38 78 22 Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia (or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Friday, 7 June 2002 15:46:48 UTC