- From: Slaydon, Eugenia <ESlaydon@beacontec.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 09:25:04 -0400
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
I like Loretta's Alternate 4. Thanks, Eugenia Slaydon Beacon Technologies, Inc. 336-931-1295 ext. 225 -----Original Message----- From: Gregg Vanderheiden [mailto:GV@trace.wisc.edu] Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 1:00 AM To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: RE: VOTE Loretta's rewrite seems to capture nicely the objectives of the previous versions. Please comment on this wording. Also, if you like the others better - please comment. Gregg Loretta wrote After considering the 3 alternatives, I'm proposing ALTERNATE 4: WCAG 2.0 is based on the same principles as WCAG 1.0. However, it is designed to be less technology-specific so that it is clearer and easier to apply those principles to a wide range of technologies. The Checkpoint Mapping between WCAG 1.0 and WCAG 2.0 Working Draft shows the way that the principles of WCAG 1.0 have been generalized in WCAG 2 Loretta
Received on Tuesday, 7 May 2002 09:16:17 UTC