- From: Cynthia Shelly <cyns@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 10:51:32 -0700
- To: "Matt May" <mcmay@bestkungfu.com>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
I like 4 too. -----Original Message----- From: Matt May [mailto:mcmay@bestkungfu.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 9:04 AM To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: Re: VOTE I vote for #4. - m ----- Original Message ----- From: "Loretta Guarino Reid" <lguarino@Adobe.com> To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Sent: Sunday, May 05, 2002 9:53 PM Subject: Re: VOTE > After considering the 3 alternatives, I'm proposing ALTERNATE 4: > > > WCAG 2.0 is based on the same principles as WCAG 1.0. However, it is > designed to be less technology-specific so that it is clearer and > easier to apply those principles to a wide range of technologies. The > Checkpoint Mapping Between WCAG 1.0 and WCAG 2.0 Working Draft shows > the way that the principles of WCAG 1.0 have been generalized in WCAG > 2.0. > > > Loretta >
Received on Tuesday, 7 May 2002 13:52:04 UTC