Condensation of R1 - R3

Tomorrow we will be discussing proposed wording for R1 consensus item in
the Requirements for

 WCAG 2.0 document   [See below]  This wording replaces 3 single
sentence items, R1,R2, R3 with one integrated statement.  It also
reflects input and discussion around this topic .

 

 

 

R1: WCAG 2.0 deliverables should be more understandable and usable by a
wider audience than was anticipated for WCAG 1.0, including policy
makers.  While the WCAG WG does not set policy, harmonization of
accessibility requirements helps drive demand for supporting
implementations in Web applications; therefore WCAG 2.0 should be
readily understandable, reference-able, and/or adoptable by policy
makers who wish to increase harmonization of Web accessibility
requirements

 

 

Gregg

 

-- ------------------------------ 
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. 
Professor - Human Factors 
Depts of Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
Director - Trace R & D Center 
University of Wisconsin-Madison 
Gv@trace.wisc.edu <mailto:Gv@trace.wisc.edu>, <http://trace.wisc.edu/> 
FAX 608/262-8848  
For a list of our listserves send "lists" to listproc@trace.wisc.edu
<mailto:listproc@trace.wisc.edu>