- From: Jonathan Chetwynd <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 21:36:41 +0100
- To: "Jim Ley" <jim@e-media.co.uk>, "Matt May" <mcmay@yahoo.com>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, "Wendy A Chisholm" <wendy@w3.org>
from: http://www.access-board.gov/sec508/guide/1194.22.htm#(l) Web page authors have a responsibility to provide script information in a fashion that can be read by assistive technology. When authors do not put functional text with a script, a screen reader will often read the content of the script itself in a meaningless jumble of numbers and letters. Although this jumble is text, it cannot be interpreted or used. Is this correct? - Do screen readers often read the script itself? - Does this relate to the absence of functional text? personally i feel this may have been thrown together in a rush. Wendy wrote: 508 says you can use scripts, if functional text is provided - in other words if they are usable by a screen reader. Access Board's info: http://www.access-board.gov/sec508/guide/1194.22.htm#(l) It doesn't say this. Section K (which is not in the contents), and makes no reference to javascript or scripting states: A text-only page, with equivalent information or functionality, shall be provided to make a web site comply with the provisions of these standards, when compliance cannot be accomplished in any other way. The content of the text-only page shall be updated whenever the primary page changes. This (again) seems to be hasty, possibly a reference to, or attempt to include the <no script> attribute/tag. I'm not at all convinced this meets what seems to be the popular wai 'universal' idea. Is it a reasonable request? I think it is possibly a misguided one. thanks jonathan chetwynd IT teacher (LDD) j.chetwynd@btinternet.com http://www.peepo.com "The first and still the best picture directory on the web"
Received on Tuesday, 25 September 2001 17:04:47 UTC