- From: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
- Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 21:20:52 -0400
- To: "gregory j. rosmaita" <oedipus@hicom.net>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
At 03:16 PM 2001-09-10 , gregory j. rosmaita wrote: > >GJR: which is the point of public review - wasn't kelly's concern adequately >addressed via the response archived at (long URI warning): ><http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2001JulSep/0843>http://lis ts.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2001JulSep/0843 AG:: True confessions, when I read the two assertions up front: - this is technology-specific - it's basically in there both of which I felt were a) important and b) untrue, I stopped reading. Yes, the edit in that post eliminates the chance to say "nowhere can I find..." But it's not an adequate response because the rewrite still hides a major point as if it were minor. The injunction to "label form controls" is not only not technology-specific, it is just-right abstraction. It is abstract because it applies to interactive widgets found in web media from left and right. It is appropriately focused because form controls have their own class-specific requirements and problems. Talking about labels in general is diffuse and weak. Talking about the requirement to have labels for form controls is important to say because that is so often where the process breaks down, and tends to break irreparably. The generalized discussion of "use structure and labels ..." misses the essential before:after relationship that is at the heart of this rule. Use labels that let the user know before they activate the control what will happen after they activate the control. This is the essence inherited from the ten commandments of UI usability. And the time separation or sequence is essential to capturing what is required. That is why I felt I should come back and reiterate the flow of reasoning I felt had been mostly missed, while it is essential to getting across this critical injunction for web accessibility. It's not just a "for instance" of "use labels." It's a "for instance" of "give advance warning" as well. Of course it is a example of both of those. But it is the second which lends it its proper importance. Which is, like, at the head of the class. Al
Received on Monday, 10 September 2001 20:57:24 UTC