- From: Jason White <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>
- Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 10:39:28 +1000
- To: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
- Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Interesting minutes. A quick suggestion: move "scripts" out of checkpoint 1.1. They are covered by checkpoint 4.4. The result is that an implementor can choose whether or not to provide an alternative to scripts, and therefore decide to comply (or not to comply) with checkpoint 4.4, without being regarded as having failed checkpoint 1.1, which everyone agrees is a much more fundamental requirement. I would also like to have a summary, after the meeting, of the proposals which are put forward. Wishing you much success at the meeting, Jason.
Received on Monday, 10 September 2001 20:39:37 UTC