- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 08:13:45 -0700
- To: "Charles F. Munat" <chas@munat.com>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
At 3:13 AM -0700 2001/8/20, Charles F. Munat wrote: >If it were up to me, I would break out nav and comp and make three >guidelines: WCAG, WCNG, and WCCG, for Accessibility, Navigability, and >Comprehensibility respectively. If we did this, I expect that WCAG would be >slightly smaller, WCNG would be of moderate size, and WCCG would be as large >or larger than the current guidelines. That's how much attention >comprehensibility deserves (hell, needs). >OK, everyone gasp and yell "NO WAY!" >This is important, so I will start a new thread for it. And yes, I'm >serious. I don't think I'll yell that. It's an intriguing suggestion, but perhaps you are actually describing three different sections of WCAG 2.0 -- instead of the current guidelines now. In other words it might be possible to include this within one document's structure, but maybe not THIS document we're working on right now. I also agree with you that it doesn't seem like a checkpoint because it just states a principle instead of telling what to do or how to do it. --Kynn -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@reef.com> Technical Developer Liaison Reef North America Accessibility - W3C - Integrator Network Tel +1 949-567-7006 ________________________________________ BUSINESS IS DYNAMIC. TAKE CONTROL. ________________________________________ http://www.reef.com
Received on Monday, 20 August 2001 11:58:26 UTC