- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 18:09:34 -0700
- To: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
- Cc: Loretta Guarino Reid <lguarino@Adobe.com>, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
At 06:23 PM 8/16/2001 , Al Gilman wrote: > >appropriate." Alternate suggestion: "...for the site's audiences, > >known and anticipated." > >AG:: >Known and anticipated is too small. See reply to Anne re 'purpose' not >good to >substitute for 'content.' I was going to say that but it would have looked silly to argue with myself -- but this is the main reason that we do not want to make this say "audiences". But "content" is misplaced too. "Content-centric" design is dangerous to accessibility. We need to push for a shared "centrism"...the choice as to reading level is _not_ based only on the content, but also on the end user and the author. --Kynn -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@reef.com> Technical Developer Liaison Reef North America Accessibility - W3C - Integrator Network Tel +1 949-567-7006 ________________________________________ BUSINESS IS DYNAMIC. TAKE CONTROL. ________________________________________ http://www.reef.com
Received on Thursday, 16 August 2001 21:10:20 UTC