- From: Anne Pemberton <apembert@erols.com>
- Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2001 17:10:22 -0400
- To: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>, jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au, Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>, Web Content Guidelines <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Wendy,
"Provide a variety of interaction modes" deserve your jargon
alert! From the uses I make of the web, I consider "interaction" to be the
various shockwave/flash games, puzzles, quizzes, slide shows, and
input/output schemes that are the joy of the kids! And yes, I would love
to see more of these .... but somehow I don't think that is what everyone
is envisioning ... Or is it?
Anne
At 01:52 PM 8/3/01 -0400, Wendy A Chisholm wrote:
>2.1 used to read: 2.1 Provide more than one path or method to find content.
>I propose that for the next draft, we include both checkpoints - as
>discussed yesterday. However, the success criteria for 2.1 (more than one
>navigation mechanism) needs a note similar to what we are doing for the
>input errors checkpoint.
>
>I'm still not sure that this really captures the issue. The "what" is
>that people interact with content in different ways, therefore you ought
>to facilitate the various interaction modes in order to benefit the widest
>range of users.
>
>Could we just say that? "Provide a variety of interaction modes" (jargon
>alert!) This is similar to "Provide a variety of presentation modes"
>which is basically what 3.4 boils down to.
>
>Thoughts?
>
>--wendy
Anne Pemberton
apembert@erols.com
http://www.erols.com/stevepem
http://www.geocities.com/apembert45
Received on Friday, 3 August 2001 17:15:41 UTC