- From: Anne Pemberton <apembert@erols.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 16:50:41 -0400
- To: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>, <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Greg, If I may, I'd like to change my choice of B, to D.... I like that option so much better than drawing a single line everyone has to hop to ... Anne At 11:36 AM 7/30/01 -0400, Kynn Bartlett wrote: >At 11:18 AM -0500 2001/7/29, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote: >>Would we >>a) Put in a rule that says "go as far down that ruler as you can"? >>or >>b) Draw a line on the ruler and say "you must get below that line but >>donít need to go lower -- though it would be good if you did"? >>option (c) -- "you must have content that works for all on the rule" >>doesnít work since the rules must go down to 0 to include all. > >(d) State where it is that you lie on the ruler, and have good reasons for > that decision. > >--Kynn > >-- >Kynn Bartlett <kynn@reef.com> >Technical Developer Liaison >Reef North America >Accessibility - W3C - Integrator Network >Tel +1 949-567-7006 >________________________________________ >BUSINESS IS DYNAMIC. TAKE CONTROL. >________________________________________ >http://www.reef.com Anne Pemberton apembert@erols.com http://www.erols.com/stevepem http://www.geocities.com/apembert45
Received on Monday, 30 July 2001 16:55:54 UTC