- From: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 13:52:56 -0400
- To: Adam Victor Reed <areed2@calstatela.edu>, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Adam, I'm not sure why I addressed you by your middle name when I wrote this. ??? ahhh, the wonders of the mind. Sorry about that. --w At 08:49 PM 7/18/01 , Wendy A Chisholm wrote: >Victor, > >As I understand the specific issue that Lisa raises, there are two types >of Hebrew, one with vowel marks and one without. If someone is presented >Hebrew without vowel marks, they might not be able to read it (either >through a processing disability of their own or their user >agent's). Therefore, we want to suggest using Hebrew with vowel marks. > >One way to generalize this is to say >"use fonts, languages, API's, and protocols..." >or >"use character encodings, languages, API's, and protocols..." >or >"use character sets, languages, API's, and protocols..." > >This is based on my understanding of these documents: >http://www.w3.org/International/O-charset.html >http://www.w3.org/International/O-fonts.html >http://www.w3.org/International/O-MissCharGlyph >http://www.w3.org/International/O-HTML-tags.html > >"content mode" seems too general a term and one that I do not see used in >the Internationalization documentation on the W3C site. >http://www.w3.org/International/ > >I also think that we might be able to include this as an example of >selecting which (markup) language to use - assuming that with SVG and >future support of styling languages one could select or create a Hebrew >font with vowel marks over one without. > >Regardless, this is a good example to add as part of the rationalization. > >Thanks, >--wendy > > >At 08:59 PM 5/18/01 , Adam Victor Reed wrote: >>I suggested the addition of content modes to Gudeline 4.1 as a >>possible way of dealing with the vowel mark problem in Hebrew and >>Arabic, which was brought to our attention by Lisa Seeman (vowel marks >>are required to support screen reading in user agents, and for >>accessibility to people with limited reading ability.) If there >>is no objection, I would like to see Gudeline 4.1 updated as follows: >> >>4.1 Choose content modes, languages, API's, and protocols that support >>the use of these guidelines. >> Content modes (e.g. Hebrew with and without vowel marks,) >> markup languages, multimedia formats, software interface >> standards, etc., vary in their support of accessibility. When >> choosing which technologies and content modes to use, consider >> how easy it is apply these guidelines. Where feasible, favor >> content modes and technologies that: >> * support assistive technology in user agents; >> * permit equivalents to be associated with or synchronized >> with auditory, graphical, and multimedia content; >> * allow the logical structure of the content to be defined >> independently of presentation; >> * support device-independence; >> * are documented in published specifications and can be >> implemented by user agent and assistive technology >> developers. >>-- >> Adam Reed >> areed2@calstatela.edu >> >>Context matters. Seldom does *anything* have only one cause. > >-- >wendy a chisholm >world wide web consortium >web accessibility initiative >seattle, wa usa >tel: +1 206.706.5263 >/-- -- wendy a chisholm world wide web consortium web accessibility initiative seattle, wa usa tel: +1 206.706.5263 /--
Received on Thursday, 19 July 2001 13:51:57 UTC