- From: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 12:29:19 -0400
- To: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Kynn, In your mesage to IG you say that this technique "BREAKS HORRIBLY in Netscape 4 for Mac 5 and in Netscape 4 for Windows." That doesn't sound too convincing that it's a good thing to do. <grin/> How does it break? Are there possible work-arounds? I guess you could browser-sniff for Netscape and serve a different SS to them... I agree that it could be moved up to the color section, but what kind of warning should we issue with it? --wendy At 11:56 AM 7/18/01 , Kynn Bartlett wrote: >At 3:41 PM -0400 2001/7/17, Wendy A Chisholm wrote: >>Hello, >> >>A new CSS Techniques draft is available at: >>http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/WD-WCAG20-CSS-TECHS-20010716/ > >How about the issue of system defaults on colors? The benefits are: > >1. It stands a very good chance of being contrasty-enough. >2. It stands a good chance of meeting the user's specific needs. > >See my note on wai-ig: > >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ig/2001JulSep/0078.html > >--Kynn > >Oh wait -- there it is at the bottom, under user-defined CSS. In my >opinion it's a valid recommendation for the "colors" section, not >buried in the appendix. > >-- >Kynn Bartlett <kynn@reef.com> >Technical Developer Liaison >Reef North America >Accessibility - W3C - Integrator Network >Tel +1 949-567-7006 >________________________________________ >BUSINESS IS DYNAMIC. TAKE CONTROL. >________________________________________ >http://www.reef.com -- wendy a chisholm world wide web consortium web accessibility initiative seattle, wa usa tel: +1 206.706.5263 /--
Received on Wednesday, 18 July 2001 12:18:38 UTC