- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 15:41:33 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo <emmanuelle@teleline.es>
- cc: <apembert@erols.com>, Lisa Seeman <lseeman@globalformats.com>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Clearly it is possible to control some environmental circumstances. Equally clearly, not all, and for many reasons. I t would be possible to moe the kiosk to the library where it is quiet, but if it is providing information about the trains then the most useful place to have it is at the station, noise and all, out in the open where people can use it with a minimum of fuss. The point was really whether or not we should mention scenarios which are the same as accessibility requirements. Actually I think it would be useful to do this the other way around, explaining that it is possible to imagine some disability-related scenarios in terms of more familiar environments. For example, it is difficult to read a lot of text on a road sign you are driving past - if there isn't an illustration to give you an idea of whether it is worth reading, most people simply drive straight past. Or the idea that trying to use a cell phone to find information or services on the web is a little like having a highly magnified screen, set to high contrast, and having a simplified keyboard. But except as a way of helping people to understand what the requirements are for accessibility, I prefer to see these additional benefits in material produced by the Education / Outreach group to promote the guidelines, rather than in the guidelines themselves. cheers Charles McCN On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo wrote: Hi, In fact, the question that I tried to highlight is that, applying the usual rules covers the external factors. That which can suppose future uses of Internet under non usual conditions, at the moment. Regards, Emmanuelle ----- Original Message ----- From: "Anne Pemberton" <apembert@erols.com> > Emmanuelle, > > Handicapping environmental conditions are controllable at the user level > more efficiently than at the page author level. If a kiosk is located in an > noisy location, it should be provided with a personal hearing device > (movable speaker, earphones, etc.) There is nothing the page author can do > to improve the situation other than comply with the usual guidelines. If > the page or kiosk interface is provided in visible print, it should also > provide it in audio and in graphics. What else would you have a page author > do? [snip] > > But the most effective answer to temporarily disabling environmental > conditions is either to modify the hardware to accommodate if it is a > regularly-occuring condition, or wait and use the Internet/affected sites, > at a more appropriate time and place. > > Anne >
Received on Monday, 16 July 2001 15:41:37 UTC