Re: distraction: bane or content?

At 10:41 PM 3/11/01 -0500, Marja-Riitta Koivunen wrote:
>Authors could provide enough semantic information

If that "could" moves through "should" towards "must" we'd be getting well 
along.

The general aim of "repurposing" demands that in many cases authors (or the 
choice mechanisms provided for selection/presentation of content) must 
convey what they mean, i.e. the underlying semantics of whatever 
structural/presentational elements they use.

This process is involved in all the principles, particularly 
"Transformable" and "Controllable". Of course the conveyance must be 
"Comprehensible" and attention need be paid to "Compatible".

--
Love.
                 ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE

Received on Monday, 12 March 2001 08:26:55 UTC