- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 06:26:49 -0500 (EST)
- To: Marja-Riitta Koivunen <marja@w3.org>
- cc: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>, WAI <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, Marja-Riitta Koivunen wrote: Should we then have one of these also for all Gestalt and visual perception related laws, such as, don't rely on proximity/texture/size/shape alone to point out similarities/differencies? Don't rely on good continuation or closure alone. CMN In theory. I think in practice that's a lot of what we are saying, but in different words. MRK [snip] Authors could provide enough semantic information so that users don't have to rely on visual presentation. And when they do provide the semantics it also becomes easier to change the presentation with stylesheets. CMN This is the basic key. (And is something we say in more or less those words already). cheers Chaals
Received on Monday, 12 March 2001 06:26:50 UTC