- From: Robert Neff <robneff@home.com>
- Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2001 12:16:44 -0500
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, "Wendy A Chisholm" <wendy@w3.org>
- Cc: "Judy Brewer" <jbrewer@w3.org>
how about, <start rewrite> Since the intial release of the WCAG 1.0 in May 1999, a wide audience has had the opportunity to review and implement the checkpoints. Therefore a working draft of the next version has been intiated with the goal to incorporate comments and to address implementation, additional languages so a wider audience may more easily understand the checkpoints. This Working Daft will also reduce the time and costs to review, understand and implement the checkpoints. As this Working Draft builds upon the WCAG 1.0, the objective has not changed and that is to 'explain how to make Web content accessible to people with disabilities and a wider audience through guidelines.' <end rewrite> i took some liberties and i have my falk vest on <smile> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Wendy A Chisholm" <wendy@w3.org> To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Cc: "Judy Brewer" <jbrewer@w3.org> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 3:08 PM Subject: Proposa for Abstract for WCAG 2.0 working draft > Before publishing a new working draft I need to add an abstract. What do > people think of this: > Abstract > This Working Drafts is the first step towards incorporating feedback > received on WCAG 1.0 since its publication in May 1999. Primarily, this is > the first attempt to write checkpoints that may be applied to a wider range > of languages and that may be understood by a more varied audience. Since > this Working Draft builds on WCAG 1.0 it has the same aim: explain how to > make Web content accessible to people with disabilities. > -- > wendy a chisholm > world wide web consortium > web accessibility initiative > madison, wi usa > tel: +1 608 663 6346 > /-- >
Received on Sunday, 21 January 2001 12:28:49 UTC