RE: Proposa for Abstract for WCAG 2.0 working draft

looks good to me.  

minor typo:  In the first line "This Working Drafts" should be "This Working
Draft" (no s).

-----Original Message-----
From: Charles McCathieNevile [mailto:charles@w3.org]
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 12:19 PM
To: Wendy A Chisholm
Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org; Judy Brewer
Subject: Re: Proposa for Abstract for WCAG 2.0 working draft


Fantastic. I presume taht WCAG 1.0 is a link explaining what it means.

Charles McCN

On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Wendy A Chisholm wrote:

  Before publishing a new working draft I need to add an abstract.  What do
  people think of this:
  Abstract
  This Working Drafts is the first step towards incorporating feedback
  received on WCAG 1.0 since its publication in May 1999. Primarily, this is
  the first attempt to write checkpoints that may be applied to a wider
range
  of languages and that may be understood by a more varied audience.   Since
  this Working Draft builds on WCAG 1.0 it has the same aim: explain how to
  make Web content accessible to people with disabilities.
  --
  wendy a chisholm
  world wide web consortium
  web accessibility initiative
  madison, wi usa
  tel: +1 608 663 6346
  /--


-- 
Charles McCathieNevile    mailto:charles@w3.org    phone: +61 (0) 409 134
136
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative                      http://www.w3.org/WAI
Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053, Australia
until 6 January 2001 at:
W3C INRIA, 2004 Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex,
France

Received on Friday, 19 January 2001 15:31:37 UTC