- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 11:44:54 -0600
- To: "'Wendy A Chisholm'" <wendy@w3.org>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Cc: "'Judy Brewer'" <jbrewer@w3.org>
Very nice. Do we want to say we are trying to make them apply to a wider range of technologies and understandable too? Then it might say we are trying to make them apply to a wider range of technologies and understandable to more varied audiences and in different languages? Gregg -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Wendy A Chisholm Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 2:08 PM To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Cc: Judy Brewer Subject: Proposa for Abstract for WCAG 2.0 working draft Before publishing a new working draft I need to add an abstract. What do people think of this: Abstract This Working Drafts is the first step towards incorporating feedback received on WCAG 1.0 since its publication in May 1999. Primarily, this is the first attempt to write checkpoints that may be applied to a wider range of languages and that may be understood by a more varied audience. Since this Working Draft builds on WCAG 1.0 it has the same aim: explain how to make Web content accessible to people with disabilities. -- wendy a chisholm world wide web consortium web accessibility initiative madison, wi usa tel: +1 608 663 6346 /--
Received on Saturday, 20 January 2001 18:01:40 UTC