Re: Accessibility vs. consideration X: how to handle from William Loughborough on 2001-01-03 (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org from January to March 2001)

From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2001 06:03:22 -0800
To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010103055958.03503150@mail.gorge.net>

At 08:12 AM 1/3/01 +0200, Lisa Seeman wrote:
>terms  such as "due burden"

I think "due burden" is a really great notion. It's a form of 
"responsibility of the author".

While we mustn't sweep aside the designers' concerns, there are 
requirements/restraints and, yes, burdens - sort of like the "cross I bear" 
- poor babies.

--
Love.
                 ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE

Received on Wednesday, 3 January 2001 09:02:46 UTC