Re: Updating 2.4, rewritten

I agree with the proposal (but won't be at the meeting).

cheers

Charles McCN

On Sun, 27 May 2001, Jason White wrote:

  This is a good proposal.

  If it isn't there already, we need an entry in the glossary to clarify
  that "automatic refresh" is not confined to the non-standard but
  ubiquitous HTTP-equiv refresh
  header.

  If no one objects to Adam's latest proposal before or during the next
  teleconference, I propose that it be adopted for purposes of the next
  draft (with status "new").


-- 
Charles McCathieNevile    http://www.w3.org/People/Charles  phone: +61 409 134 136
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative     http://www.w3.org/WAI    fax: +1 617 258 5999
Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia
(or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)

Received on Wednesday, 30 May 2001 01:56:39 UTC