- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 17:33:33 -0500
- To: "'Adam Victor Reed'" <areed2@calstatela.edu>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Hi I'm not sure we should take this approach (a do not use timeouts). There are reasons for doing this (security is one) and we shouldn't prohibit. I think we should adopt the approach used by UA and most other places... that of giving a warning and allowing extra time. There is a complication with HTTP.... But maybe something could be written into a page.... Thoughts anyone? Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Human Factors Depts of Ind. and Biomed. Engr. - U of Wis. Director - Trace R & D Center Gv@trace.wisc.edu, http://trace.wisc.edu/ FAX 608/262-8848 For a list of our listserves send "lists" to listproc@trace.wisc.edu -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Adam Victor Reed Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2001 3:20 PM To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: Updating 2.4, rewritten The page which contains the timeout that prompted me to attempt a revision of Guideline 2.4 is now http://www.dell.com/us/en/dfb/default.htm The text announcing the time-out is: "Due to the high demand and limited quantity of our available products, your selection(s) will be removed from your cart after 15 minutes of inactivity." I have re-written my proposed update of Guideline 2.4 to reflect discussion on the list. 2.4 Do not limit the time that a user may need to understand or interact with your content. * Avoid demands that the user respond within a preset period. * Use automatic refresh and delayed redirection only when necessary to bring superceded content up to date. * Content must cooperate with user agent mechanisms for preventing motion (including flicker, blinking, flashing, self-scrolling etc) and for control of the rate at which it occurs. Note that flicker effects can cause seizures in people with photoepilepsy. -- Adam Reed areed2@calstatela.edu Context matters. Seldom does *anything* have only one cause.
Received on Sunday, 27 May 2001 18:34:21 UTC