- From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
- Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 05:52:39 -0700
- To: Adam Victor Reed <areed2@calstatela.edu>, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
At 12:31 AM 5/23/01 -0700, Adam Victor Reed wrote:
>does not deal explicitly with timeouts...Mechanisms that required a timed
>response include:
Pedantically, the fact that timeouts aren't used as an "included mechanism"
doesn't exclude them.
Of course they should be included but I think this is "editorial".
--
Love.
ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE
Received on Wednesday, 23 May 2001 08:50:43 UTC