- From: Adam Victor Reed <areed2@calstatela.edu>
- Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 00:31:56 -0700
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
I recently encountered a nasty timeout barrier on a major commercial site. After going through several steps in an ordered sequence, I was momentarily distracted and encountered a time-out that prevented me from continuing, and had to re-start from the beginning of the sequence. Our current 2.4 in http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/WD-WCAG20-20010328.html does not deal explicitly with timeouts. It reads 2.4 Give users control over how long they can spend reading or interacting with content. Mechanisms that required a timed response include: * automatic refresh, * redirection, * flicker, * blinking This can be satisfied by providing an option to deactivate automatic updating, or to control the rate at which it occurs. User agents may also offer control over this effect. Note that flicker effects can cause seizures in people with photoepilepsy. I would like to propose the following instead: 2.4 Do not place limits on the time that a user may need to understand or interact with content. Eliminate: * demands that the user respond within a preset time * automatic refresh and delayed redirection * flicker, blinking, flashing, self-scrolling, or other animation effects that cannot be disabled by the user. Content must cooperate with user agent mechanisms for preventing flicker, or for control of the rate at which it occurs. Note that flicker effects can cause seizures in people with photoepilepsy. -- Adam Reed areed2@calstatela.edu Context matters. Seldom does *anything* have only one cause.
Received on Wednesday, 23 May 2001 03:32:04 UTC