- From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
- Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 07:35:33 -0700
- To: "Bailey, Bruce" <Bruce.Bailey@ed.gov>, "'Anne Pemberton'" <apembert@erols.com>
- Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Received on Friday, 11 May 2001 10:34:05 UTC
At 09:25 AM 5/11/01 -0400, Bailey, Bruce wrote: >I understood that the objective of this exercise was to present an example >of how illustrations can be used to make even a technical document of some >value to a non-reader I don't think that's the case. E.g., Lisa is a "reader" with certain characteristics that make some "accommodations" valuable beyond just "nice to have". We are not trying to devise hieroglyphics or re-invent Bliss Symbols. Some of our clients *need* there to be other-than-just-text in order to make stuff accessible. Even though they can read. -- Love. ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE
Received on Friday, 11 May 2001 10:34:05 UTC