- From: Anne Pemberton <apembert@erols.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 18:41:46 -0400
- To: "Bailey, Bruce" <Bruce.Bailey@ed.gov>
- Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Bruce, Thanks, Bruce. I really did put a lot of energy into it, and not enough time to make hubby growl over the project... At 10:23 AM 5/10/01 -0400, Bailey, Bruce wrote: > Dear Anne (et al.) First of all, let me say that I very much like >your work at URL: ><http://users.erols.com/stevepem/guidelines/G3/g3.html> > I guess this >means I met your and Bruce's challenge to prove that even >> the guidelines can be illustrated! My challenge was more on the order >that illustrations can not adequately REPLACE text. > You are confusing illustrations with symbolism. Illustrations, by definition, illustrate something, often text ... Pictures, painting, drawings, maps, and other graphic types can be illustrations, or they may stand as content on their own depending on their complexity. An aside: One of the few sites I have on my links page for the kids that is used independently by first graders is a site that displays a satellite view of a spot on the site map ... needs no reading by the user to use it to get a very interesting picture which is a interesting to scientists as to my first graders ... (how often is text able to span such a group of users?)<grin> Anne Anne Pemberton apembert@erols.com http://www.erols.com/stevepem http://www.geocities.com/apembert45
Received on Thursday, 10 May 2001 21:02:29 UTC