- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 02:26:59 -0400 (EDT)
- To: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
- cc: "Bailey, Bruce" <Bruce.Bailey@ed.gov>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Well, in that sense nor did english. Communication is not a mathematically precise exercise, but a "best approximation to something workable". (Or is it just me that feels that there are many different understandings out there of the WCAG specifications?) Charles At 01:57 PM 4/26/01 -0400, Bailey, Bruce wrote: >Bliss was meant to be a universal written language. It didn't work out.
Received on Sunday, 29 April 2001 02:27:10 UTC