- From: Lisa Seeman <seeman@netvision.net.il>
- Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 10:41:17 +0200
- To: "Adam Victor Reed" <areed2@calstatela.edu>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Just off the top of my head I think that this solution may violate other WCAG checkpoints and guidelines. In fact I think most of the principles of accessibility in general are also violated. Thanks anyway for trying Lisa -----Original Message----- From: Adam Victor Reed <areed2@calstatela.edu> To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Date: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 10:55 PM Subject: Implementing vowel marks >On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 10:55:51PM +0200, Lisa Seeman wrote: >> >> >Dumb question, why are the vowels usually omitted in Hebrew and >.... >> In the mean time the event I have been dreading has happened. Access-Israel, >> the accessibility advocates in Israel, have asked me to make their site >> accessible. >> Any volunteers? > >I'm not volunteering to do it, but I can tell you how. > >1. Build a collection of images for each character > with all possible vowel marks. > >2. Prepare an IMG tag for each image, with source, border=0, and > alt="H" (with the actual hebrew letter in place of H) > >3. Build a tool that, given the standard spelling of a word, > automatically replaces that word with the vowelized image tags if > the vowelization is unique, and lets you choose from a list of > vowelizations if it isn't. If a dictionary of vowelizations is > available, such a tool may be readily implemented as a macro on top > of an EMACS HTML editor. If you can find a skilled EMACS macros > programmer who knows the vowelization system, she should be able to > build this tool for you in a couple of days' work. > >4. Recruit volunteers with knowledge to the vowel mark system to use > this tool to translate the actual pages. > >The resulting pages will be readable as Voweled Hebrew in a graphic >browser, and as standard Hebrew text (from ALT tag content) in reading >browsers, lynx etc. >-- > Adam Reed > areed2@calstatela.edu > >Context matters. Seldom does *anything* have only one cause. > >
Received on Thursday, 19 April 2001 03:41:08 UTC