- From: Jonathan Chetwynd <jay@peepo.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 14:49:07 -0000
- To: <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, "Anne Pemberton" <apembert@crosslink.net>
- Cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Green Bus Red Bus. Before this business about universal solutions goes too far, I'd like to point out that I spend a fair amount of time doing ridiculous things like painting the roses. One will never be able to cater for all tastes, its a question of making a decent attempt. icydk if the bus is the wrong color it contains either no or the wrong semantic content and no longer serves the intended purpose. jay@peepo.com Jonathan Chetwynd special needs teacher and web accessibility consultant. ----- Original Message ----- From: Anne Pemberton <apembert@crosslink.net> To: <gv@trace.wisc.edu> Cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Sent: Monday, March 13, 2000 12:31 AM Subject: RE: A proposal for changing the guidelines > Gregg, > > Speaking for those who would prefer the pages with heavy graphics, perhaps > even heavier than most pages are now (or at least more meat in the > graphics!), I agree with your concerns. The graphics form must convey the > fullness of the information, even tho it is sometimes difficult to assemble > sufficient graphics to convey the whole story. The goal of dynamically > created pages should be to make the whole presentation: graphics, sound, > multi-media, text, and mixes tailored to the user, all convey the same > story. I suspect that before this can become realistic, authoriting tools > will have to be able to generate the parts from the whole, and flag the > author when a page has insuffucient graphics and/or text. Is this possible? > > Anne > > At 04:07 PM 3/12/2000 -0600, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote: > >The bug-a-boo I see is ensuring that the alternative form created by the > >server does indeed have all the information. I wonder if we could > >generate a set of rules that would do that. I THINK (but I don't know) > >that the current WCAG does that. We just need an application note (or a > >techniques doc section or supplement) that would make it clear exactly how > >to do that. Once that was done - it would be interesting to see if it > >would indicate that the language in the WCAG itself would need change (or > >not) to tune it for this usage. > > > >Comments anyone? > > > >Gregg > > Anne L. Pemberton > http://www.pen.k12.va.us/Pav/Academy1 > http://www.erols.com/stevepem/Homeschooling > apembert@crosslink.net > Enabling Support Foundation > http://www.enabling.org > >
Received on Monday, 13 March 2000 10:07:04 UTC