- From: Jonathan Chetwynd <jay@peepo.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 09:40:36 -0000
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, "Al Gilman" <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
In case member would like some stats to back up my arguments about private non commercial browsing. www.peepo.com which is completely non commercial averages 1450 hits per week, and has highs of 8000 hits per week and 500 user sessions per week. I work hard but there is no way I can visit that many sites commercial or no. jay@peepo.com Jonathan Chetwynd Special needs teacher / web accessibility consultant education and outreach working group member, web accessibility initiative, W3C ----- Original Message ----- From: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net> To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Sent: Monday, January 24, 2000 2:27 AM Subject: Re: Does the user know for sure whether the page is dynamic or static? > At 05:16 PM 1/23/00 +0000, Jonathan Chetwynd wrote: > >Do dynamic pages have good english titles that are directly relevant to > >their contents? > > In terms of the technical definition of the medium, titles apply equally to > static or dynamic pages. > > In terms of the compliance levels, or how much the opportunity to title is > used, comparing static and dynamic page populations, I don't know. > > >I find it very difficult to find titles for pages... > > I absolutely agree. For static pages, too. > > I have trouble seeing how we are going to get the publishing public to > improve on this poor performance. > > There may be some hope for improvement if web publishing really does get > re-industrialized into capital-intensive publishing factories such as the > megaservices bruited about by Microsoft. Server-hosted evaluation with > interactive repair, hardwired into the publishing path. We might have a > fighting chance. > > Al > > >
Received on Monday, 24 January 2000 04:43:46 UTC