- From: Leonard R. Kasday <kasday@acm.org>
- Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2000 09:48:50 -0400
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Kynn asked >If we adopted a "use graphics" requirement as a P1, would a blind >designer be able to meet that requirement effectively? There are lots of cases where a blind designer could use graphics as effectively, or actually more effectively, than a sighted person. These are cases where the graphics are selected or generated in a rule based or standardized way. For example, there are packages that generate flow charts from a textual description of a process. These insure a sensible flow chart... at least a chart that "parses" correctly. On the other hand, I've seen too many flow chart style diagrams by sighted people where I have trouble understanding what conventions if any they're using. I'll take a rule based design by a blind indivdiual any day. Other examples are graphs generated from data, schematic diagrams generated from pspice lists, and icons selected from a standardized set. Also, page layout and color selection can be made according to rules and standards. Now, what about more creatively artistic uses of design, uses that can't be reduced to mathematical or verbal rules? Well, first of all that goes beyond our guidelines: we're just looking at usability and I think rule-based graphics should handle that. Second of all, I think there are certainly some blind individuals who can produce better art than some sighted individuals (better than me for example), certainly among people who have some vision and early visual experience. As for art by people born blind... I'm not familiar with that area but I woudn't be surprised there's some remarkable use of shape and form. -- Leonard R. Kasday, Ph.D. Institute on Disabilities/UAP, and Department of Electrical Engineering Temple University 423 Ritter Annex, Philadelphia, PA 19122 kasday@acm.org http://astro.temple.edu/~kasday (215) 204-2247 (voice) (800) 750-7428 (TTY)
Received on Wednesday, 5 April 2000 09:48:21 UTC