- From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
- Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 07:49:53 -0700
- To: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- CC: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
14.2 Supplement text with graphic or auditory presentations where they will facilitate comprehension of the page. [Priority 3] IJ:: "This seems to mean that an all-text document...cannot conform at Level Triple-A." The decision as to what qualifies as "where they will facilitate" is an easy exit for this since so many on this list and IG have made it clear that in their humble opinions the addition of graphic or auditory presentations not only will not facilitate, but in fact inhibit comprehension. No matter how deplorable it may be that non-readers are shut out of access to text, until something more than "wouldn't it be nice if..." shows up, things like 14.2 can have no effect: i.e. *what* graphics, etc. will actually be useful? The problem of pinning down what colors are "effective" is a trivial problem compared to which illustrations are in fact illustrative and the color debate rages on. Triple-A in this case is in the mind of the author since the trial judge would be hard put to argue that the GL home page would demonstrably improve with the addition of illustrations in the face of opposing views claiming that they interfere with usability. -- Love. ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE http://dicomp.pair.com
Received on Tuesday, 24 August 1999 10:50:36 UTC