- From: Jason White <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1999 09:26:25 +1000 (AEST)
- To: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
I agree with Charles. In fact, one could argue that the distinction between priorities 1 and 2 in the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines is firmly related to the difference between accessibility strategies as a remedy, and access conceived as a fundamental, infrastructural aspect of the design of electronic documents. It is at the second level that markup features such as ABBR and ACRONYM assume particular importance by allowing a higher quality of braille/speech output in user agents which support them (this latter issue is being addressed by the User Agent guidelines). Actually, all three sets of guidelines should be considered as a package, since there are aspects of the Content guidelines (at priority 2 level) which are based on the anticipated satisfaction of requirements set forth in the user agent guidelines. To this extent, the User Agent and Web Content documents complement each other.
Received on Tuesday, 20 July 1999 19:26:33 UTC