- From: ADAM GUASCH-MELENDEZ <ADAM.GUASCH@EEOC.GOV>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jul 1999 16:48:00 -0500
- To: kynn-hwg@idyllmtn.com
- Cc: w3c-wai-eo@w3.org, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
I can't speak for the rest of the world, but that certainly appears to be what is happening within the federal government. Of course, the good news is we're still over a year away from having to reach Double-AA compliance, and there's time for modifications to the checkpoints. Robert Neff and I had concerns about different checkpoints, but the issue was the same - as written, it's too easy to read a blanket requirement into the various checkpoints. >>> Kynn Bartlett <kynn-hwg@idyllmtn.com> 07/18 1:06 PM >>> The problem as I see it is that they are not being adopted as "guides" but rather as "requirements"; the helpful checkpoints that can be figured out by anyone with just a smidgen of common sense can be easily twisted into firm, hard checkpoints that MUST be satisfied in order to achieve a "Double-AA compliance" rating.
Received on Monday, 19 July 1999 16:48:55 UTC